Energy Literacy Advocates Newsroom


Shale Gas - How Much is There?

Wednesday, November 18, 2009


Tapping into shale for natural gas deposits is not something new in the US. However there has been much talk of somewhat recent drilling technology and how much NG just might be available using new techniques. This discussion has been going on for some time, and it seems very similar to the oil discussion to me. We are likely nowhere near running out of either resource, but that is not the point. The point is that both oil and NG has become increasingly more time and resource consuming to drill and harvest. That still leaves us in a situation where increasing price pressures (not so much present currently with the recession) cause great harm to economic growth.

The following article notes the concern of a gentelman who, whether right or wrong, seems to be closed out of the debate as shale gas becomes a hot item once again. It's ashame we can't look at these issues thoughtfully and rationally, in order to get a true picture of the possibilities they hold for the future. A similar example would be the hype over ethanol a few years back. There is nothing wrong with ethanol in my view, (a domestically produced fuel with about the same or perhaps slightly better environmental impact than oil), the problem was touting it as a viable alternative to oil when experts knew it would never account for more than 10-20% of our total fuel use.


Shale or sham?

Nov 13, 2009 Houston Chronicle
Shale or sham?

By LOREN STEFFY Copyright 2009 Houston Chronicle

Art Berman didn't set out to become the Cassandra of shale gas. That's simply been the result as the Sugar Land petroleum geologist and consultant has persisted in raising doubts about the hottest play in the domestic energy industry.

Natural gas extracted from shale formations has transformed the U.S. energy outlook, leading to predictions that it could produce as much as half of our natural gas by the end of the next decade. Shale gas, though, requires more expensive drilling techniques to produce than conventional gas. That made shale gas attractive last year, when natural gas was selling for $13.58 per million British thermal units, but it can be a money-loser at today's prices of less than $4.50.

In a boom-prone industry known for greeting new discoveries with wide-eyed hype, shale gas has unleashed a gusher of zeal, sparking a drilling craze and soaring lease rates across millions of acres from Texas to New York.

Berman isn't saying that the major shale players — companies such as Chesapeake Energy, Devon Energy and Houston-based Petrohawk Energy — are wrong, but he's skeptical that shale gas will be the domestic energy boon that the companies claim.

“I'm saying it's a bubble,” Berman said. “They're creating an illusion.”

Decline rates disputed

That view puts Berman at odds with a host of energy companies, consultants and investment bankers, who claim shale gas may more than double our domestic supply. They argue Berman's analysis is flawed.

The two sides disagree on how to calculate the decline rates for the wells. In simple terms, Berman believes that shale gas wells will play out much faster — producing much less gas — than his detractors do. He also believes that many of the wells being drilled in shale won't be commercially viable.

His conclusion is based on production rates from the Barnett Shale near Fort Worth, the country's oldest field, which he says show steep and persistent declines. Supporters say the initial declines ease over time and settle into a steady production stream.

In criticizing shale, though, Berman has become something of an Oil Patch pariah.

“I'm being creamed,” he said. “There's a brotherhood of defenders out there, and they're all lined up against me.”

A column he wrote for the trade publication World Oil got spiked, and Berman resigned in protest. He claims the shale companies put pressure on World Oil's publisher to silence him.

‘Time to move on'

John Royall, president and chief executive of Gulf Publishing, said he didn't receive any pressure from gas companies. World Oil serves a global audience, and gas shale is largely a domestic issue. Berman had written on the topic for a year, and Royall decided that was enough.

“Art had an interesting take on shale gas,” he said. “It was interesting, provocative stuff, but it was time to move on.”

Berman doesn't come off as obsessed or paranoid. He simply believes that the industry has abandoned caution when it comes to shale, wasting millions drilling wells with a lack of scientific analysis.

“All of my instincts say if you approach it this way, it's just insanity,” he said.

If he's right, the insanity could affect us all. As Congress discusses carbon capture and environmentalists champion converting vehicles to run on natural gas, the prospect that gas supplies could be far less than we think could have a profound economic impact on the country.

“My message isn't ‘this is bad,' it's that we need to practice some caution here,” Berman said.

Loren Steffy is the Chronicle's business columnist. His commentary appears Sundays, Wednesdays and Fridays. Contact him at loren.steffy@chron.com. His blog is at http://blogs.chron.com/lorensteffy/.

Labels:

posted by Jamie Lang at 3:08 PM


0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Add to Google

Copyright 2007- 2009 © Energy Literacy Advocates - All rights reserved.